Live · as of May 29, 2026
Hormuz closure: REALIZED (ongoing)Oil-infra strike: PARTIALLY REALIZEDCable severance: REPAIR-RISK REALIZEDCeasefire: IN EFFECT (not economic)
Brent ~$92/bblHormuz ~11 vessels/dJKM / TTF ~$18 / $16.5Urea >$850/MTFreight ~$2,800/40ft
Regional impact

Every economy has a
different exposure.

12 economies analyzed across energy, food, trade, and financial channels. Some benefit from disruption. Some face existential pressure. Understanding the asymmetry is where the macro edge lives.

Net winners
United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia
Net losers
China, EU, Japan, India, South Korea, Egypt, Pakistan
Mixed
UAE (Fujairah bypass vs non-relocatable hub), Brazil (oil/ag winner offset by fertilizer-import cost)
Key asymmetry: Saudi Arabia is the only economy net-long a Hormuz closure. Egypt is the largest ceasefire-beneficiary. Pakistan carries unique double-Hormuz risk: its energy supplier and ~$38B remittance lifeline are the same region.
Scenario impact matrix
EconomyHormuzStrikeCableCeasefireNet
United StatesModest winnerModest winnerModerate loserNeutralMixed / modest winner
ChinaSevere loserModerate loserModerate loserStrong winnerLoser (best-hedged)
European UnionSevere loserModerate loserModerate loserStrong winnerLoser (stagflation)
JapanCatastrophicSevere loserModerate loserVery strong winnerMost exposed G7
IndiaSevere loserModerate loserModerate loserStrong winnerLoser (triple hit)
Saudi ArabiaPrice winnerModerate loserModerate loserModest loserNet-long closure
United Arab EmiratesSevere loserModerate loserSevere loserStrong winnerHub model at risk
RussiaWinnerWinnerMinimalModerate loserClearest winner
South KoreaSevere loserModerate loserModerate loserStrong winnerLoser (+shipbuilding)
BrazilStrong winnerModerate winnerMinimalModest loserMixed (tilts winner)
EgyptCatastrophicModerate loserModerate loserVery strong winnerSevere loser
PakistanCatastrophicSevere loserSignificant loserVery strong winnerMost vulnerable
01
United States28.8Twinner
Net petroleum exporter since 2020 (record 2.8M b/d net exports in 2025, 13.6M b/d production). Only ~2% of US consumption transits Hormuz, so the US is insulated on physical supply and benefits from reserve-currency safe-haven inflows — but exposed to the global price and the domestic-inflation/Fed channel. SPR ~409-415M bbl plus a 172M bbl exchange (within a 400M bbl IEA coordinated release) cushions pump prices.
high
Energy exposure

Net petroleum exporter since 2020; 2025 net exports a record 2.8M b/d; crude production record 13.6M b/d (2025 avg, peak Jul 2025); shale ~9.04M b/d (~65% of output). Only ~0.5M b/d crude from the Persian Gulf via Hormuz in 2024 = ~7% of crude imports, ~2% of petroleum-liquids consumption (EIA). Alternatives: domestic shale, Canadian pipeline crude (largest import source), Latin America. Insulated on physical supply; exposed to the marginal global price.

Food security

Large net food/ag exporter by volume but flipped to a net agricultural trade deficit (record -$40.7B TTM Dec 2024, projected -$49B FY2025; demand/strong-dollar driven, not a supply vulnerability). Fertilizer: imported $9.37B in 2024, ~$1.16B (~12%) from Gulf states (Saudi $797M, Qatar $362M) — a second-order input-cost channel. Domestic food-inflation vulnerability LOW (grain/protein surplus).

Trade exposure

Negligible direct Gulf/Red Sea routing; Atlantic/Pacific trade does not transit Hormuz. Indirect exposure via global container-rate inflation (Asia-Europe spot +25-35% sustained during Red Sea rerouting; +$200-400/TEU).

Financial exposure

Reserve-currency safe-haven beneficiary: Gulf disruption drives flight-to-dollar/Treasuries, lowering US funding costs even as oil rises (USD settles ~80-90% of oil trade). Key risk is the inflation channel forcing Fed tightening (2022 shock added ~$45/bbl in H1; OECD models US 2026 inflation ~4.2%). No sovereign-distress risk; no large federal SWF (state-level only, e.g., Alaska ~$80B).

Substitution capacity

Slow-but-real shale elasticity: new well ~9 months drill-to-production; 2022 response only +0.7-0.9M b/d (capital discipline). A 6-12 month upside lever, not an instant offset. SPR ~409-415M bbl (Mar-Apr 2026, capacity 714M); a 172M bbl exchange (part of a 400M bbl IEA coordinated release) launched for summer-2026 delivery — substantial near-term cushion.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Brent +55% to ~$112-120 (realized path); US physical supply intact (~2% via Hormuz); WTI rises with the global benchmark; shale margins expand; SPR exchange deployed to cap pump prices. Net macro GDP-neutral-to-positive on energy terms-of-trade; CPI +1-2pp risk; gasoline rose 7.5% to $3.20/gal (2 Mar 2026) then above $4.00.
Strike
1990 analog: 4.3M b/d removed, oil $15-$42 in 2 months. Shale + SPR + Canadian supply insulate physical availability; primary US impact is price-driven inflation, manageable.
Cable
Relatively insulated; main Asia-Europe cables carry ~25% of that traffic but US transatlantic/transpacific routes are largely unaffected. Marginal financial-data latency risk for Gulf/Asia desks.
Ceasefire
Brent mean-reverts toward pre-conflict $71-72; shale margins compress; SPR refill resumes; safe-haven USD inflows partially unwind. The US gives back the windfall but suffers no lasting damage.
Historical behavior

1973-74: OAPEC embargo quadrupled prices, triggered stagflation. 1979: prices >doubled, Volcker appointed Aug 1979. 1990: Gulf War removed 4.3M b/d, oil $15-$42 in 2 months, inflation expectations contained. 2022: Russia +$45/bbl H1, record ~180M bbl SPR release, sluggish shale (+0.7-0.9M b/d). Pattern: each cycle the US grows more insulated as production rises.

Key second-order effect

Simultaneously administering the blockade and benefiting from elevated prices. US LNG at 57% of EU imports, locking in long-term market share.

02
China18.5Tloser
The largest single user of Hormuz oil (~26.9% of Hormuz crude flows, Q1 2025 EIA; ~45-50% of China's own crude imports transit the strait) and Iran's #1 crude customer (~1.38M b/d in 2025). A price-taker bearing the full import-cost shock and losing discounted Iranian barrels — but the best-prepared loser, holding ~1.4 billion barrels of reserves (~121 days of cover) and a Russian ESPO pipeline hedge that bypasses Hormuz.
high
Energy exposure

Crude imports 11.6M b/d (2025); ~45-50% of China's crude imports transit Hormuz. China takes ~26.9% of Hormuz crude flows (5.4M b/d, EIA Q1 2025 — the earlier 37.7% figure was unconfirmed and is corrected down). Iran's #1 customer: ~1.38M b/d Iranian/suspected-Iranian crude in 2025 (peaked ~1.8M b/d Apr 2025), ~70% processed by Shandong teapots. Hedge: Russia (largest supplier, ~20% of imports, ESPO pipeline bypasses Hormuz), Kazakhstan/Central Asia pipelines.

Food security

Grain basic self-sufficiency: record 706.5M tonnes (2024), large strategic stocks. Vulnerability is soybean: ~15% self-sufficient, imports 105M tonnes (>60% of global soybean trade), but soy routes (Brazil/US) are largely non-Hormuz, so exposure is via global freight inflation. Food-inflation vulnerability moderate.

Trade exposure

Heavy: Gulf energy + Asia-Europe goods. Red Sea rerouting (+10-15 days, +40% fuel, freight +149% in 2024) raises export logistics costs. Belt & Road Gulf infrastructure exposed (>$100B invested in Iranian energy/infrastructure — a 'trapped creditor' dynamic).

Financial exposure

CNY pressured by the energy-import bill (price-taker on +55% Brent); PBOC manages the peg with ~$3.2T FX reserves. Petroyuan ambition partly realized (first digital-yuan crude settlement Oct 2023) but marginal — CNY non-convertible on capital account, USD still ~80-90% of oil settlement. Conflict accelerates the de-dollarization narrative, not the mechanics. (CNY depreciation attributable specifically to the energy bill: data not publicly isolable.)

Substitution capacity

Best-hedged major importer via stockpiling: SPR + commercial inventories ~1.4 billion bbl by Dec 2025 (~121 days of cover, >IEA 90-day standard), accumulated ~1.1M b/d through 2025. Russia ESPO + Central Asia pipelines bypass Hormuz; Brazil adds incremental barrels. Reserves cushion ~3-4 months; substitution otherwise measured in months.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Worst-hit major economy: ~5-5.8M b/d of crude at risk + ~1.38M b/d cheap Iranian crude cut off. Draws ~121-day reserve; ramps Russian ESPO/Central Asia and Brazilian pre-salt (non-Hormuz). Manufacturing input-cost spike; GDP drag if prolonged >3-4 months as reserves deplete.
Strike
Gulf-infrastructure hit removes part of China's Saudi/Iraqi/Omani/UAE supply; reserves + Russian crude backfill; price shock the bigger channel than volume.
Cable
Direct hit — China on SMW4/PEACE Asia-Europe systems; ~25% of Asia-Europe traffic affected in 2024 events; latency surge for trade/financial flows; weeks-to-months repair.
Ceasefire
Strong winner of de-escalation: import bill falls with Brent reversion to ~$71; Iranian discounted barrels resume; likely 'buys the dip' to restock, supporting prices.
Historical behavior

Net oil exporter until 1993, so 1973/1979/1990 had limited direct domestic impact. 2022: bought discounted Russian/Iranian crude aggressively, became the price-insensitive marginal buyer of sanctioned barrels, and accelerated SPR stockpiling (the strategy leaving it ~1.4B bbl by 2025). Established pattern: respond to shocks by stockpiling cheap sanctioned crude and leaning on pipeline supply.

Key second-order effect

$100B Iranian investment creates trapped-creditor dynamic. Chinese refiners pivot to Brazilian pre-salt; Gulf crude market share in China's basket falls structurally.

03
European Union18.3Tloser
An incomplete post-Russia energy pivot leaves the EU exposed: ~10% of its LNG comes from Qatar (~7% of EU LNG transits Hormuz), gas storage entered the disruption at a record-low ~28% (Mar 2026, EIA), Germany is in its deepest manufacturing recession, and the bloc is the most Red Sea/Suez trade-exposed economy. The ECB held its deposit rate at 2.00% (19 Mar 2026) and faces a stagflation trap. France is the relative winner within the bloc via nuclear.
medium
Energy exposure

EU imported >140 bcm LNG in 2025 (US 56-58%, Russia 13.9%, Qatar 8.9%, Algeria 6.6%); Russia now ~12% of total gas (was >40% in 2021). Conflict channel: ~10% of Europe's LNG comes from Qatar, ~7% of EU LNG transits Hormuz (EIA). Italy (~30% Qatar-dependent), Belgium, Poland most exposed. France insulated via nuclear (Flamanville-3 EPR online Dec 2024, 6 new reactors planned). EU gas storage hit a record-low ~28% (Mar 2026), refilling through spring 2026 (EC targets 80% by end-summer); an exact current fill % was not independently verifiable (the 38.21% AGSI figure could not be confirmed) — a thin buffer entering the disruption.

Food security

Broadly cereal-secure but a net importer of fertilizer feedstock; gas-price spikes hit nitrogen-fertilizer production directly (ammonia is gas-intensive). Red Sea rerouting raised grain/fertilizer dry-bulk freight in 2024. Energy-to-fertilizer-to-food transmission is the key vulnerability.

Trade exposure

Most Red Sea/Suez-exposed of the major economies. Cape rerouting: +10-15 days, +40% fuel, Asia-Europe freight +149% in 2024 (5x spike), +25-35% sustained premium, +$200-400/TEU. Directly inflates import costs and manufacturing supply chains.

Financial exposure

EUR pressured by the energy-import terms-of-trade shock. ECB held the deposit rate at 2.00% on 19 Mar 2026 (a further hike is judged probable but had not occurred as of the data cutoff — correcting an earlier draft that assumed a June hike to 2.25%). ECB scenarios: adverse (oil peak $119/bbl, gas EUR87/MWh) adds ~+1.5pp cumulative inflation through 2028; severe (oil $145, gas EUR106) adds +6.3pp. EU 2026 growth cut toward 1.1%, inflation up to 3.1% (EC Spring 2026 Forecast); April 2026 headline inflation ~3% on +10.9% energy. High-debt periphery (Italy) faces spread-widening risk.

Substitution capacity

Slowest to substitute. Options: more US LNG (already 56-58%, near terminal saturation), Qatar North Field East (mid-2026), coordinated gas-storage filling, nuclear restart/extension (France), renewables (48% of EU electricity 2025 vs 36% 2021). Multi-quarter-to-multi-year levers; near-term a price-taker on LNG.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Loses ~7-10% of LNG (Qatar); TTF gas (>EUR60/MWh by mid-Mar 2026) + power spike; storage cannot rebuild, raising winter 2026-27 supply-crisis risk; Italy/Belgium/Poland hardest. German manufacturing recession deepens; ECB forced to hike into weakness. 2026 GDP ~1.1%, inflation 3.1%.
Strike
Oil-price channel (Brent +55%) raises diesel/transport/petrochemical costs; less LNG-specific than closure but compounds the industrial-cost squeeze; pass-through to goods inflation.
Cable
High exposure — IMEWE/SMW4/PEACE land in Europe; ~25% of Asia-Europe data at risk; Frankfurt/Paris financial-center latency and cloud/e-commerce disruption; weeks-to-months repair.
Ceasefire
Largest relief beneficiary: gas/oil fall, manufacturing margins recover, ECB can resume easing, EUR stabilizes. The EU has the most to gain from de-escalation.
Historical behavior

1973-74 & 1979: severe importer pain drove France's Messmer nuclear plan (1974) — the structural reason France is insulated today. 1990: Gulf War spike ($15-$42) contributed to recession. 2022: the defining recent shock — Russia cut pipeline gas, TTF >EUR300/MWh, drove REPowerEU (EUR300B), US-LNG tripling 2021-2025, and the nuclear policy reversal. The 2026 conflict tests a still-incomplete transition.

Key second-order effect

Stagflation trap — energy shock raises inflation while crushing demand. Having diversified from Russian gas into Qatar LNG, EU finds Qatar LNG also transits a war zone.

04
Japan4.2Tloser
The highest Hormuz oil dependency of any G7 economy: ~94% of crude from the Middle East (IEEJ: 95.9% FY2024, 93.0% Apr-Nov 2025), ~93% transiting Hormuz, into refineries engineered for Gulf medium-sour grades. A double-hit via the energy bill and a weak yen (2022 analog: a record JPY 20T trade deficit). Mitigant: the world's deepest strategic stockpile, ~483M bbl combined (~166 days). LNG Hormuz exposure (~15-20%) is the larger unresolved unknown.
medium
Energy exposure

Crude imports 2.36M b/d (2025); ~94% from the Middle East (IEEJ: 95.9% FY2024, 93.0% Apr-Nov 2025); H1 2025 >95% of refinery feedstock from the Gulf. ~93% of oil imports transit Hormuz — highest of any major economy. LNG 66.3 Mt (2025): Australia >40% (largest); LNG Hormuz exposure ~15-20% (Qatar is a major supplier — the earlier ~6% figure is unverified and likely understated, flagged for confirmation). Refineries engineered for Gulf medium-sour grades, so non-ME substitution is slow.

Food security

Net food importer (~38% caloric self-sufficiency). Not directly Hormuz-exposed for food; vulnerable via energy-driven input inflation and weak-yen pass-through. Government rice stockpile reportedly drew down to ~15 days by May 2026 (provisional). Specific Hormuz-linked grain reserve day-count: data not publicly available; proxy: fertilizer/feed-grain import reliance >90%.

Trade exposure

Energy is the dominant Gulf-routed flow; finished goods mostly Pacific/trans-Asia, so Red Sea/Suez exposure is moderate vs the EU. Cape rerouting adds 3,500 nm / 10-14 days, +$200-400/TEU, war-risk $150k-300k/voyage. Asia-Europe rates ran 25-35% above baseline. Petrochemical/LPG feedstock (>70% of Japan's LPG from Gulf) is a deeper exposure than crude price alone.

Financial exposure

Yen is the key transmission channel. 2022 analog: fossil-fuel import bill nearly doubled (JPY 17T to 33.7T); record JPY 20T+ ($155B) trade deficit; yen 109.8 to 131.4/USD. Energy shock + weak yen is self-reinforcing; Nikkei fell >2% on conflict onset (provisional).

Substitution capacity

Best-in-class reserve buffer, weak supply substitution. SPR end-2025: ~483M bbl combined (263M bbl government-held + ~220M bbl mandated industry stock, EIA Apr 2026) ~166 days of cover at ~2.9M b/d demand; the 90-day government strategic-reserve target is set by Japan's Oil Stockpiling Act. (The earlier '254 days' figure is not supported by primary data and is corrected.) Already executing its largest-ever release (from March 2026) and arranged non-Hormuz crude from May 2026. Refinery rigidity caps fast crude-grade switching.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Severe: ~93% of oil supply at risk (Apr 2026 ME crude imports reportedly -67% YoY, total crude imports ~-50% provisional); SPR covers ~166 days but refinery throughput is grade-constrained; acute yen pressure; LPG/petrochemical feedstock disruption.
Strike
Gulf infrastructure hit flows straight to the import bill; SPR cushions volume, not price.
Cable
Lower direct hit (Japan not on the Red Sea chokepoint cluster); financial-data latency to the EU rises.
Ceasefire
Strong relief rally; yen and import bill normalize; SPR-refill demand supports crude.
Historical behavior

1973: 90% ME-dependent, only 55-day stockpile; GDP fell ~7%; pivoted toward nuclear, conservation, electronics. 1974: IEA founding member, built the 90-day-minimum regime. 1978: established the national oil-reserve system. 2022: record JPY 20T trade deficit, yen collapse.

Key second-order effect

Entire petrochemical and LPG supply chain depends on Gulf NGL/LPG (>70% of Japan's LPG). Plus rice stockpile depletion to ~15 days — potential political crisis alongside energy crisis.

05
India3.9Tloser
A multi-channel loser: 88.6% crude-import-dependent (~40% via Hormuz), with the Gulf supplying 20-30% of urea and 30% of DAP into a fertilizer-subsidy bill blowing out toward Rs 1.92 lakh crore (could breach Rs 3 lakh cr if prolonged), plus a ~$49B Gulf remittance corridor at risk. Mitigated by a $691.1B reserve buffer, a proven Russian-crude hedge (31.5% of imports), and grain self-sufficiency. Carries 1991 BoP scar tissue.
medium
Energy exposure

88.6% crude-import-dependent (FY26). Russia 31.5% (peaked ~36% in 2024, ~50% by Mar 2026 provisional); Persian Gulf share fell 63% to 46% by 2024 as Russia displaced barrels. ~40% of crude imports transit Hormuz. Russian crude (via Suez/Cape, not Hormuz) is a structural hedge that partially insulates India vs Japan. India received a 30-day US emergency waiver (6 Mar 2026, provisional) to continue Iranian purchases.

Food security

Self-sufficient in grains (FCI buffers well above the 3.0M t wheat + 2.0M t rice strategic minimums; rice stocks 40-50M t). But ~60% of edible oil imported (palm from Indonesia/Malaysia) — freight/energy shock raises cooking-oil inflation for 1.4B. Fertilizer is the critical vulnerability: Gulf supplies 20-30% of urea, 30% of DAP; observed urea +20% YoY, DAP +10%+, MOP +23%.

Trade exposure

Heavy Gulf/Red Sea routing for energy and westbound goods. Cape rerouting adds ~$300/40ft container + 10-14 days. Fertilizer and edible-oil cargoes most exposed.

Financial exposure

Twin currency + fiscal channel. Rupee 85.6 to 93.2/USD (among worst EM); FX reserves $691.1B (Mar 2026, RBI) buffer RBI smoothing (~13-14 months import cover). CAD widening ~0.5% to 2.1% of GDP (mostly oil); Brent breached $120. Fertilizer subsidy FY26 Rs 1.68 to revised Rs 1.86 to projected Rs 1.92 lakh cr (~14% over budget); could breach Rs 3 lakh cr if the crisis prolongs (CRISIL/ET). Remittances: $129B (2023-24, RBI), ~38% from the GCC (UAE 19.2%, Saudi 6.7%) ~ $49B Gulf-India lifeline directly exposed; 220,000+ nationals reportedly repatriated by Mar 2026 (provisional).

Substitution capacity

Moderate-fast on crude (Russia/US/West Africa pivot proven 2022-25); slow on fertilizer (Gulf-concentrated) and edible oil (SE Asia, Hormuz-unaffected but freight-exposed).

Scenario impact
Hormuz
~40% of crude + 20-30% urea / 30% DAP at risk; subsidy bill toward Rs 3 lakh cr; acute rupee pressure; ~$49B remittance corridor disrupted if Gulf hiring freezes. Russian barrels partially backfill.
Strike
Brent toward/above $120 pushes CAD to ~2.1%, subsidy +14%; food/fuel inflation hits 1.4B.
Cable
India directly in the Jeddah/Red Sea cut cluster (SMW4, IMEWE, FALCON); IT/ITES and banking latency; ~40-day median repair.
Ceasefire
Sharp relief: rupee stabilizes, subsidy pressure eases, remittances resume; India recovers fast given the reserve buffer.
Historical behavior

1990-91 Gulf War: evacuated ~170,000 nationals from Kuwait; oil-bill surge triggered the 1991 BoP crisis — forex fell to $1.2B (Jan 1991, ~3 weeks of imports), pledged 67t gold; catalyzed 1991 liberalization. 2022: pivoted hard to discounted Russian crude (1% to 36% by 2024), shielding the import bill — the playbook being re-run.

Key second-order effect

Gulf remittance corridor freeze — ~9M nationals in GCC representing ~$49B/year. If GCC economies collapse, removes India's single largest external income source. More macro-significant than direct oil exposure.

06
Saudi Arabia1.1Twinner
The global swing producer and the only profiled economy net-long a Hormuz closure: 2-3M b/d spare capacity plus the East-West (Petroline) pipeline (7M b/d to Yanbu on the Red Sea) lets exports keep flowing while rivals are blocked. But the Yanbu terminal loads only ~4.0-4.5M b/d, capping the windfall, and the fiscal breakeven is $90.94/bbl (2025). Offsets: war-zone risk to its own infrastructure and Vision 2030/PIF spending cuts.
medium
Energy exposure

World's swing producer. Spare capacity ~2-3M b/d (30-day bring-up, 90-day sustain); Aramco can sustain 12M b/d max for a year. Hormuz-bypass edge: East-West (Petroline) Abqaiq-to-Yanbu (Red Sea), 7.0M b/d capacity (restored Apr 2026 after IRGC strikes). Constraint: Yanbu terminals load only ~4.0-4.5M b/d — the port, not the pipe, is the bottleneck, leaving ~2.5-3M b/d of pipeline capacity unusable for export.

Food security

Heavy food importer (~80%+) via Hormuz; strategic wheat reserve ~1.5M MT (~4 months / ~120 days, provisional; Royal Decree target 6 months). Desalination ~18% of water demand (energy largely domestic). Energy-cost-insulated as a producer; food-inflation risk muted by fiscal firepower.

Trade exposure

Crude can exit via the Red Sea (Yanbu) bypassing Hormuz — a structural advantage under closure. Non-oil imports (food, goods, medicine) face severe Gulf/Red Sea routing risk; Jeddah strained under wartime rerouting.

Financial exposure

Riyal pegged 3.75/USD (stable). PIF AUM >$1.15T (2025, 5th-largest SWF; from $152B at Vision 2030 launch), target $2.67T by 2030; spring 2025 ordered 20%+ spending cuts (some dev budgets cut up to 60%). Fiscal paradox: IMF fiscal breakeven $90.94/bbl (2025), $98.36/bbl (2024) vs pre-conflict Brent $60-65, so 2025 deficit SAR101B ($26.9B); 2026 deficit ~3.3% GDP (~$44B). The Yanbu bottleneck caps export revenue regardless of price.

Substitution capacity

Fastest pivot of any profiled economy — can raise output within 30 days and reroute via Petroline. The designated swing supplier.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Biggest relative winner — exports flow via Petroline (capped ~4.0-4.5M b/d at Yanbu) while rivals are blocked; captures the price spike but with ~2.5-3M b/d stranded at the coast. Risk: its own infrastructure targeted.
Strike
Its own infrastructure was the target — IRGC struck Manifa, Khurais and an East-West pumping station (Apr 2026); pipeline restored to 7M b/d by ~Apr 12, demonstrating resilience but vulnerability.
Cable
Saudi is at the Jeddah cut epicenter (SMW4/IMEWE); Vision 2030 data-hub ambitions exposed; traffic rerouted, ~40-day repairs.
Ceasefire
Price normalizes toward $60-65 (below breakeven), the revenue windfall evaporates, fiscal-deficit pressure returns, and the Vision 2030 funding gap reopens.
Historical behavior

1973 embargo: oil $3-$12 (4x); GDP $15B (1973) to $184B (1981). 1990 Gulf War: opened the taps, production 5.1M to 8.5M b/d, captured the full windfall on higher price x higher volume — the swing-producer template now repeated. 2026: government captures ~75-80% of each incremental $/bbl; analysts estimate $25-50B added annual revenue above the $65 budget base.

Key second-order effect

Yanbu bottleneck caps monopoly power — 2.5-3M b/d arrives with nowhere to load. Creates 6-12 month window for port expansion that would make Saudi structurally more resilient.

07
United Arab Emirates509Bmixed
The only Gulf producer with material Hormuz-bypass infrastructure (Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, 1.8M b/d capacity running ~1.62-1.7M b/d in Mar 2026, second line announced to double Fujairah capacity by 2027) — so crude egress is partly insulated (~57% of exports). But the hub functions that drive the economy (Jebel Ali/JAFZA = 36% of Dubai GDP, DIFC, Emirates aviation, tourism ~13% of GDP) cannot be relocated, making the UAE a high-beta loser on escalation and winner on ceasefire.
medium
Energy exposure

Crude production 3.4-3.7M b/d; exports ~2.75M b/d; ADNOC capacity 4.85M b/d, targeting 5.0M b/d by 2027. Hydrocarbons ~25-30% of GDP. Fujairah bypass (key insulation): Habshan-Fujairah (ADCOP) routes Abu Dhabi crude to the Gulf of Oman bypassing Hormuz, 1.8M b/d capacity (running ~1.62-1.7M b/d Mar 2026, ~57% of UAE crude exports); a second pipeline is announced to double Fujairah capacity by 2027. Residual exports still route via Strait terminals; the Ruwais refinery (~922k b/d) still relies on Hormuz-side product export.

Food security

Imports >85-90% of food (strategy targets cutting reliance to 50%). Wheat ~1.95 MMT (MY2024/25); Russia the largest single supplier (831,000 MT MY2023/24) via the Black Sea — a non-Hormuz line that insulates staple grain even under closure. Desalination ~52% of water demand. Vulnerability is the Hormuz-routed container leg, not the grain origin.

Trade exposure

Non-oil foreign trade topped AED3.8 trillion (~$1.03T) in 2025 (+27% y/y, first time over $1T); re-exports AED830.2B (~$226B). Jebel Ali (DP World), largest ME port; JAFZA + Jebel Ali = 36% of Dubai's GDP (Dubai Media Office, 2025), hosting >9,000 companies. A closure chokes the Asia-ME-Europe transshipment pivot.

Financial exposure

Dubai real GDP $255.3B (2025, +5%, ~25% of national GDP, >95% non-oil). DIFC >4,500 firms; financial/insurance grew 6.7% H1 2025 (12.5% of GDP). Foreign-capital sensitivity: ADX net foreign investment ~$3B in first 5 months 2025 (+78%); DFM foreign investors = 50% of trading value, 21% of market cap — a sharp risk-off reversal vector. Tourism ~13% of GDP (~$70B 2025).

Substitution capacity

HIGH for crude egress (~1.7M b/d Fujairah bypass now, doubling by 2027). LOW for hub functions — Jebel Ali transshipment, DIFC flows, Dubai air/sea traffic cannot be relocated. Grain supply substitutable (Black Sea origin).

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Crude stranded vs ~1.7M b/d reroutable via Fujairah today; Jebel Ali transshipment (36% of Dubai GDP via JAFZA + port) severely disrupted; tourism (~13% GDP) and DFM/ADX (foreign capital ~50% of DFM trading) hit hard; Ruwais product exports blocked. Net GDP drag large despite the bypass.
Strike
Brent spike benefits ADNOC export revenue (price>volume) if UAE facilities are spared; downside if Abu Dhabi/Fujairah are targeted directly.
Cable
Acute — UAE is a regional cloud/data and energy-trading hub; subsea cuts degrade DIFC trading desks and Gulf banking; reported Iranian drone strikes on Bahrain/UAE data centers and 'protection fee' demands threaten indefinite non-repair.
Ceasefire
Strong rebound — tourism, re-exports, DFM/ADX foreign inflows snap back; the risk premium on ADNOC barrels compresses.
Historical behavior

1973: embargo +400% ($3-$12); Gulf producers gained revenue (UAE federated 1971). 1990 (Iraq-Kuwait): $17-$36 in 3 months, UAE a coalition staging hub. 2022 (Ukraine): Brent $92-$139.13 (+49%); UAE ran fiscal surpluses and benefited as a sanctions-adjacent re-export/financial conduit.

Key second-order effect

Collapse of Jebel Ali/Dubai re-export model — 36% GDP depends on free goods flow through Hormuz. Sustained closure converts Dubai from global hub to regional destination. 15-24 months to rebuild confidence.

08
Russia2.0Twinner
The clearest beneficiary, with zero direct Hormuz dependency. As the #2 crude exporter (~4.73-4.76M b/d, ~11% of global), #1 wheat exporter (~20% share) and ~18-21% of the global fertilizer market, Russia fills every gap a Gulf disruption opens. A price spike compresses its Urals discount and is the most plausible reversal of a -23.8% decline in oil-and-gas budget revenue (8.48tn rubles, 2025). The structural cost is deepening dependence on China.
high
Energy exposure

Oil exports ~238M tons (~4.73-4.76M b/d) in 2025, world's #2 crude exporter (~11% of global); China+India = 75-80% of it. Urals discount $8-15/bbl vs Brent. A Hormuz/oil shock lifting Brent widens Russia's absolute realized price and narrows the discount as buyers compete for non-Gulf barrels. Gas: EU pipeline exports -44% in 2025; Power of Siberia 1 to China +~25% to 38.8 bcm, PoS2 (50 bcm/yr) agreed Sept 2025. A ~20% global LNG disruption hands Russia Asian pricing power.

Food security

Domestic food-secure; net grain exporter. No import vulnerability; strategic gain as the marginal staple supplier to Gulf importers (e.g., ~74-80% of Egypt's wheat).

Trade exposure

Offensive/export beneficiary. Wheat: #1 exporter, ~20% share MY2024/25 (down from 25%; ~42-45 MMt). Fertilizer: ~18-21% global share, targeting 25% by 2030; 9.72 MMt to Brazil Jan-Oct 2025. Any Gulf/energy shock lifts gas-linked ammonia/urea prices — Russia benefits as a low-cost gas-feedstock producer while Western/Gulf petrochem margins compress.

Financial exposure

2022 windfall precedent: oil & gas budget revenue 11.6 trillion rubles (+28%); gas revenue $64B to $130B; record current-account surplus $230B (10.4% of GDP). Post-sanctions surplus fell to $50-60B (2023-24); 2025 oil & gas budget revenue 8.48 trillion rubles (~$103B), -23.8% y/y (TASS/Finance Ministry), ~23% of the federal budget. A Gulf price spike is the single most plausible reversal of this decline (though oil/gas fell to ~17% of revenue Jan-Feb 2026, so it cannot fully 'fix' the budget).

Substitution capacity

Russia is the substitute supplier for others. Its constraint is logistics/sanctions (shadow fleet, payment rails), not Hormuz — zero direct Hormuz dependency, giving asymmetric insulation plus gap-filling capacity in oil, gas, wheat and fertilizer simultaneously.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Maximum upside — ~20M b/d and ~20% of global LNG removed; Brent could replicate/exceed 1990's doubling or 2022's +49%. Urals discount compresses, realized prices jump; Asian buyers bid for non-Gulf Russian crude/LNG. Wheat/fertilizer co-spike.
Strike
Moderate-to-large upside via the Brent premium even without full closure.
Cable
Largely insulated (limited dependence on Gulf subsea routes); indirect benefit from rival-hub disruption.
Ceasefire
Only loser case — risk premium unwinds, Brent falls toward the $40-45 range some analysts model for 2026, squeezing the marginal Russian budget.
Historical behavior

1973/1979: USSR a major beneficiary of OPEC-driven price quadrupling/doubling — hard-currency windfall financing the late-Soviet economy. 1990: Gulf War doubling ($17-$36) aided export receipts amid collapse. 2022: the canonical case — $230B current-account surplus (10.4% of GDP), gas revenue doubling to $130B.

Key second-order effect

Fertilizer market share surge — with Hormuz disrupting ~50% of global urea/sulfur, Russian fertilizers become the only uncontested alternative. Gives Moscow leverage over India, Egypt, Brazil that reduces sanctions' political cost.

09
South Korea1.7Tloser
Near-total import dependence on crude (~100%) and heavy Hormuz exposure (~70% of total crude is Hormuz-exposed per KEIA) make Korea a stagflation-prone loser: modeling implies $150/bbl gives roughly +2.9pp inflation and -0.8pp growth. The KOSPI hit a circuit breaker (-12% in a day) on 4 Mar 2026. The silver lining is shipbuilding — Korea holds the bulk of the global LNG-carrier orderbook ($71.3B), which a Gulf/LNG crisis accelerates.
medium
Energy exposure

Imports ~100% of crude; ~70% of Korea's total crude is Hormuz-exposed (KEIA); the Middle East share of crude imports fell from 65.2% (pre-conflict) to 53.1% (Apr 2026, KITA). KOGAS sources ~38% of LNG from the Middle East. LNG (world's #3 importer, 46.684 MMt 2025): Qatar 14.9%, Oman 4.1%, UAE 0.5% — LNG Hormuz exposure ~15-20%; Australia now #1 at 31.4% (+28.7% y/y), an active diversification cushion. Power mix: coal+gas ~58%, nuclear ~31%, renewables ~10%.

Food security

Net food/grain importer but not Gulf-sourced — exposure is indirect (price channel via global grain spikes), not supply-route. Lower-tier vulnerability than energy.

Trade exposure

Petrochemical exports already -15.5% (mid-2025) on oversupply — a Gulf feedstock/oil shock further compresses naphtha-cracker margins. Semiconductors $14.97B (Jun 2025, +11.6%); Samsung+SK Hynix = 75% of global DRAM, so fab energy costs rise with LNG/power (a margin drag, not a supply break). Shipbuilding offset: 22% global share 2025, dominant in the global LNG-carrier orderbook (~$71.3B), >80% of LNG carriers.

Financial exposure

Won weakness amplifies the oil shock (imported inflation). KOSPI hit a circuit breaker (-12%) on 4 Mar 2026; import prices +16% in Mar. 2022 analog: inflation 5.09%, IMF cut growth to 2.5%. 2026 sensitivity: ~+1.1pp inflation/-0.3pp growth at $100/bbl; ~+2.9pp/-0.8pp at $150/bbl (modeled, medium confidence). April 2026: oil +9.9% triggered a 5 trillion won supplementary budget.

Substitution capacity

Moderate-to-improving: Australia LNG (31.4%) and US LNG diversify away from Hormuz; nuclear (31% of power) is a non-import baseload buffer. But crude (~100% imported, Hormuz-heavy) is hard to substitute short-term — strategic reserves (79M bbl avg 2025) and spot scrambling only.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Worst case — ~70% of crude Hormuz-exposed; Brent $150 implies ~+2.9pp inflation, -0.8pp growth; KOGAS's ~38% ME LNG most exposed. Cushion: Australia/US LNG + strategic crude reserves. Shipbuilding sees a demand surge.
Strike
$100/bbl scenario: ~+1.1pp inflation, -0.3pp growth; petrochemical margins squeezed; another supplementary budget likely.
Cable
Indirect — Korea is a data exporter, not Gulf-cable dependent; main hit is financial/trading latency with Gulf counterparties and global risk-off.
Ceasefire
Relief rally — won recovers, import bill falls, inflation eases; petrochemicals stabilize; shipbuilding LNG-carrier orders may soften as the scarcity premium fades.
Historical behavior

1973/1979: a fast-industrializing import-dependent economy severely hit by both shocks — formative driver of later energy diversification and nuclear build-out. 1990: Gulf War doubling pressured the import bill during high growth. 2022: clearest analog — inflation 5.09%, won depreciation, IMF growth cut to 2.5%, trade balance to deficit on the energy bill.

Key second-order effect

Shipbuilding windfall — sustained closure creates massive demand for VLCCs and LNG carriers. Korea dominates (>80% LNG carrier market share). Stark intra-sector divergence: energy consumers lose, shipbuilders win.

10
Brazil2.2Tmixed
A structural winner of a sustained Gulf shock: a net crude exporter (record ~3.77M b/d production, ~1.92M b/d exports in 2025, ~80% pre-salt), the #1 global soy/sugar exporter filling food gaps, and insulated at the pump by its ethanol/flex-fuel fleet (2026 fuel prices rose only ~10-20% vs 30-40% in the US). The one concentrated cost is fertilizer: Brazil imports ~70-85% of demand (96% of potash), with a ~$4.36B/yr Russia-linked bill.
medium
Energy exposure

Net crude exporter since 2024 (crude became Brazil's #1 export). Production record ~3.77M b/d (2025, +12.3%), ~1.92M b/d exported; pre-salt ~80%. Petrobras targets 4.2M b/d by 2028. Minimal Hormuz import exposure (domestic + Atlantic-basin crude); a price-taker on Brent, so a Hormuz spike raises Brazilian export revenue. Ethanol/flex fleet held 2026 fuel-price rises to ~10-20% vs 30-40% in the US.

Food security

Among the most food-secure large economies; #1 net agricultural exporter; grain exports >165M tonnes (2025). Key vulnerability is fertilizer not food: imports ~70-85% of demand (<15% domestic), 96% of potash (Canada/Russia/Belarus). Russia = 25.8% of fertilizer imports (2025); Russian-fertilizer bill record $4.17B (2024) rising to $4.36B (2025). Gas-derived nitrogen (urea) is the Hormuz-linked exposure; ~half of Brazil's fertilizer reportedly transits Hormuz (provisional).

Trade exposure

Soybeans record 108.68M tonnes (2025, ~58% of global exports, ~65% to China); corn #2 globally (35-36M tonnes); sugar #1 (record 38.23M tonnes / $18.60B 2024). Petrobras redirected exports to Asia (China 62% of Petrobras exports Q1 2026, up from 33%; US exports to zero). Cascade upside: a conflict disrupting Gulf/Black Sea food channels demand to Brazil — the marginal global gap-filler.

Financial exposure

$2.2T GDP, deep domestic markets, free-floating BRL — policy flexibility absent in Egypt/Pakistan. A commodity terms-of-trade boom (higher oil + ag) is BRL- and current-account-supportive; record April 2026 exports ~$34.15B, trade surplus ~$10.5B (+37.5% YoY, provisional). Counterweight: fertilizer-import inflation + EM risk-off outflows can pressure BRL short-term. Net financial effect positive over a sustained shock.

Substitution capacity

HIGH on energy (domestic crude + ethanol/flex fleet). LOW-MODERATE on fertilizer (96% potash import reliance; can re-route sourcing to Canada/Morocco/Middle East for phosphate but cannot replace volumes quickly).

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Strong net winner: Brent spike lifts ~3.8M b/d production revenue; global food/Black Sea disruption diverts demand to Brazilian soy/corn/sugar. Offset: Gulf ammonia/urea price spike inflates the nitrogen-fertilizer bill (potash less exposed). Net positive.
Strike
Winner on oil revenue + ethanol cushion; moderate fertilizer-cost rise. The cleanest positive scenario for Brazil.
Cable
Marginal: risk-off EM outflows pressure BRL; commodity export logistics largely intact (Atlantic routes). Net mildly negative/neutral.
Ceasefire
Commodity premia unwind — oil/ag export revenue normalizes lower, fertilizer costs ease. Net neutral-to-slightly-negative (gives back the windfall) but planting-cost relief is a domestic positive.
Historical behavior

1973: ~80% oil-import-dependent for transport; embargo quadrupled prices, launching Proalcool (Nov 1975), the foundational substitution response. 1979: deepened the ethanol mandate. 1990: Gulf War spike absorbed partly via ethanol (still a net importer then). 2022: net oil exporter; ethanol/flex held pump-price inflation to ~10-20% vs 30-40% peers — the pivot from 1973 victim to 2022/2026 beneficiary is the defining structural shift.

Key second-order effect

Geopolitical repositioning as Asia's "neutral" oil supplier. Chinese NOCs pursuing equity stakes in pre-salt blocks. Brazil-China-India oil trade shift could persist for a decade.

11
Egypt395Bloser
The highest-stress profile and the single largest ceasefire-beneficiary. Egypt is hit on all four cascade channels at once: it flipped to a net LNG importer (+188% in 2025), is the world's #1 wheat importer (~74-80% from Russia) feeding a 70M-person bread subsidy, has seen Suez Canal revenue collapse ~61% ($10.25B to ~$4B), and runs thin reserves (~$35B) under an IMF program. No offsetting export windfall; social-stability risk is the tail.
medium
Energy exposure

Swung from LNG exporter to importer in 2024. LNG imports 2.78M tonnes (2024, 7-yr high) to ~9.01M tonnes (2025, +188%, 90.9% from the US). Domestic gas output fell ~30% 2021-2024 (Zohr decline); peak power demand record 39,500 MW (Aug 2025); no net-export return until the ~2030s. Rising LNG-import dependence exactly as a Gulf shock would spike global LNG prices — a direct FX drain.

Food security

World's #1 wheat importer: 2024 imports ~12.5-14.7M tonnes (source-dependent), ~74-80% from Russia (via Black Sea/Mediterranean, not Hormuz). Bread subsidy feeds >70M of ~105M people (62M on ration cards), ~8.5M tonnes wheat/yr. The textbook food-import-shock state; the real food risk is global price inflation feeding the baladi-bread subsidy bill.

Trade exposure

Suez Canal is the core trade-revenue artery and it has collapsed: 2024 revenue $3.99-4.0B vs record $10.25B (2023), ~-61%, ~$6B cumulative loss in 2024. Recovery only partial in H2 2025. A Hormuz/Red Sea escalation pushing Gulf-to-Europe traffic to the Cape re-freezes Suez — the single largest Egyptian downside channel; World Bank estimates additional ~$10B losses.

Financial exposure

IMF EFF $3B (2023) expanded to ~$8B (2024 augmentation, 46-month); completion targeted June 2026. 4 currency devaluations since Mar 2022 to a flexible EGP. External-debt/GDP >42%; short-term debt + servicing ~$40B vs ~$35B reserves (boosted by the 2024 $24B UAE Ras El-Hekma deal). Suez -$6B in 2024 widened the FX gap; the IMF program was predicated on Suez recovery to ~$9B — an assumption now invalidated.

Substitution capacity

VERY LOW. Cannot replace Suez transit revenue, nor cover the wheat or gas gap near-term. Dependent on Gulf (UAE/Saudi) deposits + IMF disbursements as the backstop. Highest fragility of the profiled set.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Worst case: Gulf cargo bypasses Suez toward zero revenue; LNG-import bill spikes (US-sourced prices up); wheat/freight costs up. Triple FX drain on ~$35B reserves to IMF/EGP crisis risk.
Strike
Severe — energy + food cost inflation; Suez partially affected. Marginally less than full closure but still a loser.
Cable
Suez/Red Sea shipping + financial-flow disruption directly cuts transit revenue and FX; Egypt is a cable landing hub (SMW4/IMEWE) — mixed traffic/disruption risk, high relative exposure.
Ceasefire
Egypt's best scenario and only relief path — Suez traffic/revenue recovery toward the $10B baseline, LNG/wheat premia ease, EGP/IMF stress relieved. The single largest ceasefire-beneficiary of the profiled set.
Historical behavior

1967: Suez closed, Egypt devastated. 1973: ~60% wheat-import-dependent; oil-boom income widened the food gap. 1990: Gulf War disrupted Suez/remittance/tourism, offset by ~$14B Gulf/Paris-Club debt relief as a coalition member. 2022: Russia-Ukraine exposed wheat dependence (~74-80% from Russia), triggered the EGP devaluation cycle + $8B IMF program; May 2024 first subsidized-bread price hike in 36 years (5 to 20 piasters, +300%).

Key second-order effect

Suez permanent re-collapse risk — if Gulf-to-Europe traffic stays on Cape, persistent near-zero revenue. Egypt's fiscal math collapses. Social unrest tail risk.

12
Pakistan338Bloser
Carries a unique double-Hormuz risk: its energy supplier and its ~$38B remittance lifeline are the same Gulf region. ~83% oil-import-dependent (crude mostly Saudi/UAE) with Brent-indexed take-or-pay LNG; reserves $9.4B (Aug 2024) rebuilt to $14.5B by end-FY25, under a live $7B IMF program; food inflation looms over ~240M people. A closure cuts physical supply and spikes the bill simultaneously while threatening the FX backstop.
medium
Energy exposure

Crude imports 9.05M tonnes (FY2023-24); petroleum import bill $15.1-16.9B; ~137,000 b/d crude, mostly Saudi/UAE (Hormuz-routed). ~83% net import-dependent. LNG: 9 Qatari cargoes/month, Brent-indexed take-or-pay (13.37% and 10.2% of Brent). Both crude and LNG are Brent-indexed AND Hormuz-routed — double exposure. Paradox: a 2025-26 LNG surplus (demand collapse, asked Qatar to divert 24+ cargoes) yet take-or-pay means a Brent spike still inflates the bill.

Food security

~240M population; high food-import + fuel-price pass-through to food inflation (headline peaked 38% May 2023, 9.6% Aug 2024; IMF targets 5-7% FY26). IMF conditionality forced subsidy removal — an Iran-war fuel spike directly drives food inflation; Pakistan named among the most exposed Global-South states.

Trade exposure

Energy is the dominant import-bill vulnerability (crude $15-17B + LNG). Persistent goods deficit financed by remittances. Gulf/Hormuz routes carry nearly all crude + LNG — a closure severs physical supply, not just price.

Financial exposure

IMF $7B 37-month EFF (Sep 2024) + RSF. Reserves $9.4B (Aug 2024 baseline, ~2 months cover) rebuilt to $14.5B by end-FY25 (Jun 2025); the conflict-period level is not independently verified. Remittances the FX lifeline: record $38.3B FY25 (+26.6% YoY, SBP); UAE ~18.7% (~$5.5B), Saudi the largest single source. FY25 posted a first current-account surplus in 14 years — fragile gains contingent on remittance + energy-bill stability.

Substitution capacity

LOW. ~83% oil-import-dependent, Brent-indexed take-or-pay LNG, thin reserves. Some domestic gas/coal (Thar) and hydro buffer but cannot replace Gulf crude/LNG near-term. Remittance dependence means a GCC-economy shock hits the FX backstop directly — a second-order Hormuz transmission unique to Pakistan.

Scenario impact
Hormuz
Worst case — physical supply cut (Gulf crude/LNG) AND price spike on Brent-indexed take-or-pay contracts; simultaneously GCC remittance flows at risk if Gulf economies seize. The IMF program acutely threatened. KSE-100 fell -9.57% on 2 Mar 2026 (provisional).
Strike
Severe energy-bill inflation + food-inflation pass-through to 240M; remittances may hold if Gulf labor markets stay intact. Loser, slightly less acute than closure.
Cable
Disrupts remittance-transfer and trade-finance channels — uniquely damaging given remittance-FX dependence; high relative exposure.
Ceasefire
Relief — Brent eases (lowers the take-or-pay bill), remittances stabilize, food inflation cools, IMF targets achievable. Strong positive but structural fragility persists.
Historical behavior

1973: oil quadrupling drove the import bill + food inflation; flagged among most-vulnerable. 1979: second shock compounded BoP stress; recurrent IMF reliance begins. 1990: Gulf War spike pressured the import bill, partly mitigated by Gulf remittance/aid as a friendly state — the remittance-as-buffer dynamic now at risk. 2022: Russia-Ukraine energy/food spike + FX crisis to near-default, inflation 38% (May 2023), driving the $7B 2024 IMF EFF.

Key second-order effect

Energy-supplier / remittance-source double collapse — GCC supplies both energy AND remittances that finance it. Self-reinforcing external balance collapse unlike any other economy. IMF conditionality becomes impossible without emergency augmentation.

Sources & methodology

Data from EIA, IEA, IMF, World Bank, ECB, RBI, SBP, IEEJ, SIPRI, S&P Global, GIE AGSI+. 2026 conflict figures are provisional. Confidence: HIGH = primary institutional source; MEDIUM = reliable press/proxy; LOW = single source/estimate.

>