Live · as of May 29, 2026
Hormuz closure: REALIZED (ongoing)Oil-infra strike: PARTIALLY REALIZEDCable severance: REPAIR-RISK REALIZEDCeasefire: IN EFFECT (not economic)
Brent ~$92/bblHormuz ~11 vessels/dJKM / TTF ~$18 / $16.5Urea >$850/MTFreight ~$2,800/40ft
Structural Risk

The fault lines beneath
the market response.

Structural Risk is a permanent-infrastructure inventory: it converts the conflict-specific findings of Sections 1–6 into six standing tracking verticals — chokepoints, commodity weaponization, de-globalization, digital fragmentation, food resilience, and the monitoring schema that binds them. Each tracked entity is scored, tiered, and mapped to the four VegaReady scenarios, so the structural library is queryable alongside event data. These are the slow-moving fault lines beneath the fast-moving market response.

Standing findings
The six verticals
Methodology
Scoring

Each tracked entity is scored 1 (low risk/exposure) to 5 (extreme) across standardized factors. For the Chokepoint Index: volume/economic throughput, commodity criticality, bypass deficit (inverted), military contestability, and climate/physical risk — with bypass-deficit and contestability double-weighted in the rank ordering.

Source tiers

T1 = official/institutional primary sources. T2 = credible press, proprietary and institutional research. T3 = model/estimate/aggregator/social. Where a T2 outlet quotes an underlying T1 figure, it is labeled T2-citing-T1.

Confidence

HIGH = multiple T1/T2 sources agree or a single authoritative T1. MEDIUM = single credible source or modest conflict. LOW = contested, dated, or proxy-derived.

Update cadence

Tier-1 structural facts (chokepoint geography, historical embargo records) are reviewed annually; Tier-2 dynamic flows (transit volumes, FDI, tariffs) quarterly; fast-moving signals (cable faults, REE-export YoY, FAO index) monthly to event-driven.

Scenario mapping

Each record carries a scenario_mapping field linking it to one or more of the four reference scenarios (hormuz_closure, oil_strike, cable_severance, ceasefire), so the structural library is queryable alongside Phase-2 event data.

Monitoring schema — field definitions
FieldTypeDescription
idstringUnique stable identifier (e.g. chokepoint.hormuz.oil_transit)
metricstringHuman-readable metric name
geographystringISO region/country or chokepoint name
unitstringMeasurement unit (mb/d, %, USD bn, Tbps, score)
sourceobject{name, url, tier} — tier ∈ {T1, T2, T3}
tierenumData-confidence tier T1/T2/T3
update_frequencyenumannual | quarterly | monthly | weekly | daily/event
trigger_thresholdsobject{watch, alert, critical} numeric or boolean triggers
scenario_mappingarraySubset of [hormuz_closure, oil_strike, cable_severance, ceasefire]
confidenceenumHIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
lastUpdateddateISO date of last refresh
Example trigger thresholds
MetricWatchAlertCriticalCadence
Hormuz oil transit <18 mb/d <12 mb/d <6 mb/d (≈closure) daily/event
Bab el-Mandeb transit <6 mb/d <4 mb/d <2 mb/d weekly
Red Sea cable faults (concurrent) ≥2 ≥3 ≥4 (Sep-2025 type) daily/event
China REE-magnet export YoY −20% −50% −74% (May-2025 type) monthly
US avg effective tariff rate >10% >15% >17.8% (1934 high) quarterly
Bloc-to-bloc FDI gap −10% −20% −30% (post-Q1'22) quarterly
FAO Food Price Index >120 >130 >150 (2022 type) monthly

These trigger thresholds are the production spec for the live watch layer (watch / alert / critical). The live status — where each metric sits today against its thresholds — graduates to the Dashboard in a later pass; this page presents the framework and the current snapshot values from the research.

{ "id": "chokepoint.hormuz.oil_transit", "metric": "Strait of Hormuz oil transit volume", "geography": "Strait of Hormuz", "unit": "million barrels per day", "source": {"name": "EIA", "url": "https://www.eia.gov/...", "tier": "T1"}, "tier": "T1", "update_frequency": "daily/event", "trigger_thresholds": {"watch": 18, "alert": 12, "critical": 6}, "scenario_mapping": ["hormuz_closure", "oil_strike"], "confidence": "HIGH", "value": 20.0, "as_of": "2024", "lastUpdated": "2026-05-30" }
Source conflict & data-quality exceptions
FigureContested valueResolutionAnchorTier
Hormuz oil transit20 vs 20.9 mb/dEIA 20.9 for 2023; 20 for 2024 — use 2024 baseEIA 2024 = 20 mb/dT1
Taiwan Strait share">20%" vs "~50% container traffic"The ~50% (YES Containers) is container-only/aggregator; CSIS ">20% of all maritime trade" is defensibleCSIS 20%+ ($2.45tn, 2022)T2
Submarine cable count~530 vs ~600 vs ~570TeleGeography revises continuously; use ~600 / ~1.5M km with a rounding caveatTeleGeography FAQT1
Red Sea internet share"~17%" vs ">90% Europe-Asia"Different denominators (global all-traffic vs Europe–Asia bandwidth) — not contradictory; report bothCSIS / WiddershovenT2/T3
LEO vs subsea capacity ratio"175×"Single-blog source (ABHS); directionally consistent but not an anchorDirectional onlyT3
China grain-stock shares~51% wheat / ~67% cornUSDA estimates revised and aggregator-restated (CPG) — prefer direct USDA PSDUSDA PSDT2
GFSI scores2022 index valuesEconomist Impact discontinued GFSI after 2022; scores are stale — flag as last-published, not currentGFSI 2022 (last-published)T2
Caloric self-sufficiencyJapan ~40% (2009), Korea ~44% (2007)Dated baselines (2007–2010); refresh against FAOSTAT — directional onlyJapan MAFF / FAOSTATT2
Cape of Good Hope record traffic24M dwt/wk (wk Apr 13)Single-wire PROVISIONAL-2026; the 9.2 mb/d Jan–Aug 2024 flow is the clean T1 figureEIA/Vortexa 9.2 mb/dT2
Gulf/Egypt strategic reserve-daysnot publicly disclosedMost Gulf states and Egypt do not disclose reserve-days — use FX import-cover proxies; do not fabricate reserve figuresImport-cover proxy
Iraq Hormuz share22–23%Single aggregator vs EIA — report as ~22%EIAT2
Russia gas import decline−80% vs −83%Sources differ — report as >80% range>80% (range)T2

How to read this lens: Structural Risk sits above the deep dives and points down into them. The chokepoint index connects to Infrastructure; food resilience to Food & Agriculture and Water; digital/cables to Defense; weaponization to Transmission.

>